Findings and Conclusion

In our report, we first cleaned our data and utilized the k-means imputation to deal with missing value.

After exploratory analysis, we discovered a potential discrepancy between countries with different development status and income levels. We also compared the Pearson correlation with Distance correlation and discoverd little difference between linear and non-linear methods.

The statistical tests we performed tells us that the mean life expectancy in Europe and Americas are significantly different and they have the top 2 life expectancy. Africa has the lowest life expectancy. Average life span is significantly different among distinct income level groups and development status groups. People with higher income and from more developed countries tend to live longer.

From the regression, we concluded that the access to vaccines and basic clean water is really important, they have positive effects, while higher income and less alcohol will also lead to a longer life. Most importantly, we showed that the empowerment of women is significant to life expectancy, especially in middle income and upper income groups, which means increasing women’s voice in the country actually helps people live longer. Our model’s adjusted R^2 is 0.78.

By using clustering analysis on the data in 2015, we validated that k mean imputation with 4 groups is the optimal choice for imputation. We also showed the result of k mean clustering of the imputed data in the two dimensions with highest explained variance.


Challenges

In our major dataset, many variables have missing values over the years 2000 to 2016. We tried to impute them using a clustering method. However, for the variables that have more than 10% NAs, the validity of imputation is greatly reduced. So, in the end, the imputation effect is not ideal enough.

Additionally, we think it is necessary to include more variables to cover the aspects of society, economics, environment, health, and so on. Human lifespan is the result of complex influence of multiple factors. The variables we have now are not comprehensive enough to build a better model and make more accurate predictions.


Limitation, Insights, Further Improvements

Our project focuses on a general level of countries in the world—for instance, the difference of life expectancy in developed countries and developing countries. While we gained generality of the idea, we lost specificity. We have less idea of countries within the same income level, especially lower income countries. At the same time, we did not explore the difference of life expectancy in states or regions within a country, like comparison of urban versus rural areas, which should be conducted in further studies.

To solve the imputation problem in our project, we could consider two methods—on one hand, we may research more advanced methods for imputation, on the other hand, we can also try to find other data sources to fill in the missing values.

To solve the insufficient variable problem, we propose that a deeper understanding of human longevity is needed to discover more relevant factors. We should do more research in this field and try to broaden our data sources.

The conclusion from the regression model that the empowerment of women is significant to life expectancy inspires us to further study the mechanism of how improving women’s status may expand a countrywide human’s lifespan. Moreover, the access to basic clean water is the most significant contributor to longer life expectancy–a further study could be introduced in order to explore the reasons behind the relationship of basic water and life expectancy.